The source I chose from "Le Noir Et Blanc" is a
movie review of "L.A. Confidential" by Peter Travers. I chose this source to examine to see how the movie reviewers in 1997 viewed "L.A. Confidential" and compared it to the other movies at the time.
The review immediately started attacking other noir style movies such as "Mulholland Falls" for example and portrayed the noir genre as a difficult genre to write in a successful movie in, mainly because most of the ideas and styles had already been filmed. Then the movie reviewer focuses on how "L.A. Confidential" and how it successfully captures the spirit of Los Angeles during the 1940s and how it shows the underlying problems with the police force of Los Angeles.
What did I learn about Race and Class?
I learned from this review how difficult it can be for filmmakers to authentically portray the themes of race and class of Los Angeles in the 1940s. I saw how the filmmakers portrayed the distinct angles and sides of the crime in Los Angeles with the example of one police officer who chased after wife beaters and the other police officers who went out of their way to beat up Mexicans.
Overall though, the article itself mainly focused on reviewing the movie itself instead of discussing the inherent race and class issues in the movie. While the audience itself was aimed for the Rolling Stone magazine readers who would more likely be interested in reading about movies instead of about race and class issues, I was glad to get a perspective how it compared to other movies in terms of its accuracy in portraying race and class issues.